Great Strength of Awareness Scripture - Revision history

Richard at 12:44, 17 November 2009

2009-11-17T12:44:25Z

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 . If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.
 ________________________________
@@ Line 40: / Line 42: @@
 . If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?
 ________________________________
@@ Line 57: / Line 61: @@
 . Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.
 ________________________________
@@ Line 75: / Line 81: @@
 . These very stages can be applied to the other two. Superior, inferior, middling etc., singularity and so on can also be understood [thus].
-[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]
+[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as [[Nagarjuna]] has just done in v. 1-3.]
 ________________________________
@@ Line 93: / Line 115: @@
 . Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?
 ________________________________
@@ Line 109: / Line 142: @@
 /[[dus]] [[lta]] [[yod par]] [[ga la 'gyur]]//
-. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?
+. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were
 ________________________________

Richard at 04:02, 11 November 2009

2009-11-11T04:02:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 11 November 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:

	'''''(Time)'''''		'''''(Time)'''''

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་དང་མ་འོངས་པ།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་དང་མ་འོངས་པ།</span><br>
Line 21:		Line 23:

	1. If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.		1. If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་དང་མ་འོངས་པ།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།ད་ལྟར་བྱུང་དང་མ་འོངས་པ།</span><br>
Line 36:		Line 40:

	2. If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?		2. If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།འདས་པ་ལ་ནི་མ་ལྟོས་པར།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།འདས་པ་ལ་ནི་མ་ལྟོས་པར།</span><br>
Line 51:		Line 57:

	3. Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.		3. Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།རིམ་པའི་ཚུལ་ནི་འདི་ཉིད་ཀྱིས།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།རིམ་པའི་ཚུལ་ནི་འདི་ཉིད་ཀྱིས།</span><br>
Line 68:		Line 76:

	[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]		[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།མི་གནས་དུས་ནི་འཛིན་མི་བྱེད།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།མི་གནས་དུས་ནི་འཛིན་མི་བྱེད།</span><br>
Line 83:		Line 93:

	5. Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?		5. Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།གལ་ཏེ་དུས་ནི་དངོས་རྟེན་ཏེ།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།གལ་ཏེ་དུས་ནི་དངོས་རྟེན་ཏེ།</span><br>
Line 98:		Line 110:

	6. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?		6. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?

			________________________________

	<span class=TibUni18>།དུས་བརྟག་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་སྟེ་རབ་ཏུ་བྱེད་པ་བཅུ་དགུ་པའོ།།</span><br>		<span class=TibUni18>།དུས་བརྟག་པ་ཞེས་བྱ་བ་སྟེ་རབ་ཏུ་བྱེད་པ་བཅུ་དགུ་པའོ།།</span><br>

Richard at 01:51, 11 November 2009

2009-11-11T01:51:21Z

Show changes

Richard at 19:12, 8 November 2009

2009-11-08T19:12:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 8 November 2009
Line 64:		Line 64:

	dus brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa bcu dgu pa'o //<br>		dus brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa bcu dgu pa'o //<br>

			[[Category:I]] [[Category:Teachings]] [[Category:Key Terms]]

Richard at 16:04, 16 October 2009

2009-10-16T16:04:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:04, 16 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Return to '''''main page "[[Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre]]"''''' for information and links.

	(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')		(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')

Richard at 21:53, 11 October 2009

2009-10-11T21:53:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 11 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')		(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')

	19. Investigation of Time		'''19. Investigation of Time'''

	(Time)		'''''(Time)'''''

	1. /da ltar byung dang ma ~~‘ongs~~ pa//gal te ~~‘das~~ la ltos gyur na//da ltar byung dang ma ~~‘ongs~~ pa/~~/’das pa’i~~ dus ni yod par ~~’gyur~~/

			1. da ltar byung dang ma 'ongs pa/<br>
			gal te 'das la ltos gyur na/<br>
			da ltar byung dang ma 'ongs pa/<br>
			'das pa'i dus ni yod par 'gyur/<br>

	1. If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.		1. If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.

	2. /da ltar byung dang ma ~~‘ongs~~ pa//gal te de ni med gyur na// da ltar byung dang ma ~~‘ongs~~ pa//ci ltar de la ltos par ~~‘gyur~~/

			2. da ltar byung dang ma 'ongs pa/<br>
			gal te de ni med gyur na/<br><br>
			da ltar byung dang ma 'ongs pa/<br>
			ci ltar de la ltos par 'gyur/<br>

	2. If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?		2. If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?

	3. ~~/‘das~~ pa la ni ma ltos par//de gnyis grub pa yod ma yin//de phyir da ltar byung ba dang//ma ~~‘ong~~ dus kyang yod ma yin/

			3. 'das pa la ni ma ltos par/<br>
			de gnyis grub pa yod ma yin/<br>
			de phyir da ltar byung ba dang/<br>
			ma 'ong dus kyang yod ma yin/<br>

	3. Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.		3. Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.

	4. /rim ~~pa’i~~ tshul ni ~~‘di~~ nyid kyis//hlag ma gnyis po bsnor ba dang//mchog dang tha ma ~~‘bring~~ la sogs//gcig la sogs ~~pa’ang~~ shes par bya/

			4. rim pa'i tshul ni 'di nyid kyis/<br>
			hlag ma gnyis po bsnor ba dang/<br>
			mchog dang tha ma 'bring la sogs/<br>
			gcig la sogs pa'ang shes par bya/<br>

	4. These very stages can be applied to the other two. Superior, inferior, middling etc., singularity and so on can also be understood [thus].		4. These very stages can be applied to the other two. Superior, inferior, middling etc., singularity and so on can also be understood [thus].
Line 23:		Line 43:
	[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]		[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]

	5. /mi gnas dus ni ~~‘dzin~~ mi byed//gang zhig gzung bar bya ~~ba’i~~ dus//gnas pa yod pa ma yin pas//ma bzung dus ni ji ltar gdags/

			5. mi gnas dus ni 'dzin mi byed/<br>
			gang zhig gzung bar bya ba'i dus/<br>
			gnas pa yod pa ma yin pas/<br>
			ma bzung dus ni ji ltar gdags/<br>

	5. Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?		5. Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?

	6. /gal te dus ni dngos rten te//dngos med dus ni ga la yod//dngos po ~~‘ga’~~ yang yod min na//dus lta yod par ga la ~~‘gyur~~/

			6. gal te dus ni dngos rten te/<br>
			dngos med dus ni ga la yod/<br>
			dngos po 'ga' yang yod min na/<br>
			dus lta yod par ga la 'gyur/<br>

	6. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?		6. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?

	dus brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa bcu dgu pa'o // //		dus brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa bcu dgu pa'o //<br>

Richard at 16:43, 8 October 2009

2009-10-08T16:43:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:43, 8 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')

	19. Investigation of Time		19. Investigation of Time

Richard: Created page with '19. Investigation of Time (Time) 1. /da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//gal te ‘das la ltos gyur na//da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//’das pa’i dus ni yod par ’gyur/ 1…'

2009-10-08T15:59:50Z

Created page with '19. Investigation of Time (Time) 1. /da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//gal te ‘das la ltos gyur na//da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//’das pa’i dus ni yod par ’gyur/ 1…'

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 8 October 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~#REDIRECT~~[[~~rig~~ pa ~~rtsal chen gyi lung]]~~		19. Investigation of Time

			(Time)

			1. /da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//gal te ‘das la ltos gyur na//da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//’das pa’i dus ni yod par ’gyur/

			1. If the present and the future were contingent on the past, then the present and the future would have existed in the past.

			2. /da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//gal te de ni med gyur na// da ltar byung dang ma ‘ongs pa//ci ltar de la ltos par ‘gyur/

			2. If the present and future did not exist there, then how could the present and the future be contingent on it?

			3. /‘das pa la ni ma ltos par//de gnyis grub pa yod ma yin//de phyir da ltar byung ba dang//ma ‘ong dus kyang yod ma yin/

			3. Without being contingent on the past neither can be established. Hence the present and the future times also do not exist.

			4. /rim pa’i tshul ni ‘di nyid kyis//hlag ma gnyis po bsnor ba dang//mchog dang tha ma ‘bring la sogs//gcig la sogs pa’ang shes par bya/

			4. These very stages can be applied to the other two. Superior, inferior, middling etc., singularity and so on can also be understood [thus].

			[a-b: this means that you could say the same about past and future in relation to the present and present and past in relation to future as you can of present and future in relation to past as Nagarjuna has just done in v. 1-3.]

			5. /mi gnas dus ni ‘dzin mi byed//gang zhig gzung bar bya ba’i dus//gnas pa yod pa ma yin pas//ma bzung dus ni ji ltar gdags/

			5. Non-dwelling time cannot be apprehended. Since time which can be apprehended, does not exist as something which dwells, how can one talk of unapprehendable time?

			6. /gal te dus ni dngos rten te//dngos med dus ni ga la yod//dngos po ‘ga’ yang yod min na//dus lta yod par ga la ‘gyur/

			6. If time depended on things, where would time which is a non-thing exist? If there were no things at all, where would a view of time exist?

			dus brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa bcu dgu pa'o // //

Richard: Redirected page to rig pa rtsal chen gyi lung

2009-09-21T18:32:35Z

Redirected page to rig pa rtsal chen gyi lung

New page

#REDIRECT[[rig pa rtsal chen gyi lung]]