Difference between revisions of "rang bzhin lta ba'i dam tshig bzhi"

From Rangjung Yeshe Wiki - Dharma Dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Import from RyDic2003)
 
(Import from RyDic2003)
Line 1: Line 1:
[TRS 120-2] [RY]
+
consequence of a fruition contradictory with the nature [IW]
  
CHN [IW]
+
consequence of a fruition contradictory with the nature [lhan cig mi gnas 'gal gyi 'gal ba'i rang bzhin dmigs pa'i thal 'gyur gsum gyi nang gses, a consequence w contradictory fruition having been presented as sign/ reason if it is reversed [a'gal 'bras rtags su bkod pa'i thal 'gyur gang zhig bzlog na flings the consequence of contradiction w the cause rgyu dang 'gal ba'i rang bzhin dmigs pa'i rang rgyud 'phen pa ste, EG me tshad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa'i shar gzhir chos can, me tsad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa ma yin par thal, grang 'bras spu long byed yod pa'i phyir, by that consequence, that dharmin is established as grang 'bras spu long byed med de, becuase it is me tsad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa, thus 1 brings out a refuting conswquence in terms of the reasoning of the opponent] [IW]
  
 
  [[Category:Tibetan Dictionary]] [[Category:rydic2003]] [[Category:ra]]
 
  [[Category:Tibetan Dictionary]] [[Category:rydic2003]] [[Category:ra]]

Revision as of 16:26, 28 December 2005

consequence of a fruition contradictory with the nature [IW]

consequence of a fruition contradictory with the nature [lhan cig mi gnas 'gal gyi 'gal ba'i rang bzhin dmigs pa'i thal 'gyur gsum gyi nang gses, a consequence w contradictory fruition having been presented as sign/ reason if it is reversed [a'gal 'bras rtags su bkod pa'i thal 'gyur gang zhig bzlog na flings the consequence of contradiction w the cause rgyu dang 'gal ba'i rang bzhin dmigs pa'i rang rgyud 'phen pa ste, EG me tshad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa'i shar gzhir chos can, me tsad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa ma yin par thal, grang 'bras spu long byed yod pa'i phyir, by that consequence, that dharmin is established as grang 'bras spu long byed med de, becuase it is me tsad ma'i stobs kyis nges pa, thus 1 brings out a refuting conswquence in terms of the reasoning of the opponent] [IW]