Investigation of Rising and Passing: Difference between revisions

From Rangjung Yeshe Wiki - Dharma Dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Redirected page to bsko gzhag gnang ba)
Line 1: Line 1:
Return to '''''main page "[[Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre]]"''''' for information and links.
#REDIRECT[[bsko gzhag gnang ba]][[Category:ཀ]]
 
(return to list of '''''[[Contents & Translation of "Mulamadhyamakakarika: Verses from the Centre"]]''''')
 
'''21. Investigation of Rising and Passing'''
 
'''''(Disappearance)'''''
 
 
 
1. 'jig pa 'byung ba med par ram/<br>
lhan cig yod pa nyid ma yin/<br>
'byung ba 'jig pa med par ram/<br>
lhan cig yod pa nyid ma yin /<br>
 
1. Passing does not exist without or together with rising. Rising does not exist without or together with passing.
 
[The Sanskrit terms sambhava ([['byung ba]] - rising) and vibhava ([['jig pa]] - passing) are related to bhava ([[dngos po]] - thing); also cf. svabhava and parabhava. So "appearance" and "disappearance" would capture the play on the two words. Note also that in verses 15-16 the Tib. [['byung]] - [['jig]] does not translate sambhava / vibhava, but udaya / vyaya].
 
 
 
2. 'jig pa 'byung ba med par ni/<br>
ji lta bur na yod par 'gyur/<br>
skye ba med par 'chi bar 'gyur/<br>
'jig pa 'byung ba med par med /<br>
 
2. How can passing exist without rising? Is there death without birth? There is no passing without rising.
 
 
 
3. 'jig pa 'byung dang lhan cig tu/<br>
ji ltar yod pa nyid du 'gyur/<br>
'chi ba skye dang dus gcig tu/<br>
yod pa nyid ni ma yin no /<br>
 
3. How could passing exist together with rising? Death does not exist at the same time as birth.
 
 
 
4. 'byung ba 'jig pa med par ni/<br>
ji lta bur na yod par 'gyur*/<br>
dngos po rnams la mi rtag nyid/<br>
nam yang med pa ma yin no /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *ji ltar yod pa nyid du 'gyur]
 
4. How could rising exist without passing? Things are never not impermanent.
 
 
 
5. 'byung ba 'jig dang lhan cig tu/<br>
ji ltar yod pa nyid du 'gyur/<br>
skye ba 'chi dang dus gcig tu/<br>
yod pa nyid ni ma yin no /<br>
 
5. How could rising exist together with passing? Birth does not exist at the same time as death.
 
 
 
6. gang dag phan tshun lhan cig gam/<br>
phan tshun lhan cig ma yin par/<br>
grub pa yod pa ma yin pa/<br>
de dag grub pa ji ltar yod /<br>
 
6. How can those that are not established either mutually together or not mutually together be established?
 
 
 
7. zad la 'byung ba yod ma yin/<br>
ma zad pa la'ang 'byung ba med/<br>
zad la 'jig pa yod ma yin/<br>
ma zad pa la'ang 'jig pa med /<br>
 
7. The finished does not rise; the unfinished too does not rise; the finished does not pass; the unfinished too does not pass.
 
 
 
8. dngos po yod pa ma yin par/<br>
'byung dang 'jig pa yod ma yin/<br>
'byung dang 'jig pa med par ni/<br>
dngos po yod pa ma yin no /<br>
 
8. Rising and passing do not exist without the existence of things. Things do not exist without the existence of rising and passing.
 
 
 
9. stong la* 'byung dang 'jig pa dag/<br>
'thad pa nyid ni ma yin no/<br>
mi stong pa la'ang 'byung 'jig dag/<br>
'thad pa nyid ni ma yin no /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *las.  '''Ts.''' *la]
 
9. Rising and passing are not possible for the empty; rising, passing are not possible for the non-empty also.
 
 
 
10. 'byung ba dang ni 'jig pa dag/<br>
gcig pa nyid du* mi 'thad do/<br>
'byung ba dang ni 'jig pa dag/<br>
gzhan nyid du yang** mi 'thad do /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *ni.  **gzhan pa nyid du'ang]
 
10. Rising and passing cannot possibly be one; rising and passing also cannot possibly be other.
 
 
 
11. 'byung ba dang ni 'jig pa dag/<br>
mthong ngo snyam du khyod sems na/<br>
'byung ba dang ni 'jig pa dag/<br>
gti mug nyid kyis mthong ba yin /<br>
 
11. If you think that you can see rising and passing, rising and passing are seen by delusion.
 
 
 
12. dngos po dngos las mi skye ste/<br>
dngos po dngos med las mi skye/<br>
dngos med dngos med mi skye ste/<br>
dngos med dngos las mi skye'o /<br>
 
12. Things are not created from things; things are not created from nothing; nothing is not created from nothing; nothing is not created from things.
 
 
 
13. dngos po bdag las mi skye ste/<br>
gzhan las skye ba nyid ma yin/<br>
bdag dang gzhan las skye ba ni/<br>
yod min* ji ltar skye bar 'gyur /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *na]
 
13. Things are not created from themselves, nor are they created from something else; they are not created from [both] themselves and something else. How are they created?
 
 
 
14. dngos po yod par khas blangs na/<br>
rtag dang chad par lta bar ni/<br>
thal bar 'gyur te dngos de ni/<br>
rtag dang mi rtag 'gyur phyir ro /<br>
 
14. If you assert the existence of things, the views of eternalism and annihilationism will follow, because things are permanent and impermanent.
 
 
 
15. dngos po yod par khas blangs kyang/<br>
chad par mi 'gyur rtag mi 'gyur/<br>
'bras bu rgyu yi 'byung 'jig gi/<br>
rgyun de srid pa yin phyir ro /<br>
 
15. If you assert the existence of things, eternalism and annihilationism will not be, because the continuity of the rising and passing of cause -effect is becoming.
 
 
 
16. 'bras bu rgyu yi* 'byung 'jig gi/<br>
rgyun de srid pa yin 'gyur na/<br>
'jig la yang skye med pa'i phyir/<br>
rgyu ni chad par thal bar 'gyur /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *gal te 'bras rgyu'i]
 
16. If the continuity of the rising and passing of cause-effect is becoming, because what has passed will not be created again, it will follow that the cause is annihilated.
 
 
 
17. dngos po ngo bo nyid yod na/<br>
dngos med 'gyur bar mi rigs so/<br>
mya ngan 'das pa'i dus na chad/<br>
srid rgyun rab tu zhi phyir ro /<br>
 
17. If things exist essentially, it would be unreasonable [for them] to become nothing. At the time of nirvana [they] would be annihilated, because the continuity of becoming is totally pacified.
 
 
 
18. tha ma 'gags par gyur pa na/<br>
srid pa dang po rigs mi 'gyur/<br>
tha ma 'gags par ma gyur tshe/<br>
srid pa dang po rigs mi 'gyur /<br>
 
18. If the end stops, it is unreasonable for there to be a beginning of becoming. When the end does not stop, it is unreasonable for there to be a beginning of becoming.
 
 
 
19. gal te tha ma 'gag bzhin na/<br>
dang po skye bar 'gyur na ni/<br>
'gag bzhin pa ni gcig 'gyur zhing/<br>
skye bzhin pa yang gzhan du 'gyur /<br>
 
19. If the beginning is created while the end is stopping, the stopping would be one and the creating would be another.
 
 
 
20. gal te 'gag bzhin skye bzhin dag/<br>
lhan cig tu yang rigs min na/<br>
phung po gang la 'chi 'gyur ba/<br>
de la skye ba* 'byung 'gyur ram /<br>
 
['''Lha.''' *ba'ang]
 
20. If it is also unreasonable for stopping and creating to be together, aren't the aggregates that die also those that are created?
 
 
 
21. de ltar dus gsum dag tu yang/<br>
srid pa'i rgyun ni mi rigs na/<br>
dus gsum dag tu gang med pa/<br>
de ni ji ltar srid pa'i rgyun /<br>
 
21. Likewise, if the continuity of becoming is not reasonable at any of the three times, how can there be a continuity of becoming which isnon-existent in the three times?
 
'byung ba dang 'jig pa brtag pa zhes bya ba ste rab tu byed pa nyi shu gcig pa'o //<br>
 
[[Category:I]] [[Category:Teachings]] [[Category:Key Terms]]

Revision as of 12:54, 10 November 2009

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php?title=Investigation_of_Rising_and_Passing&oldid=222351"