greed, hate and delusion: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 21:01, 15 September 2007

Redirect to:

Revision as of 12:13, 6 October 2007 (view source) Richard (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:01, 15 September 2007 (view source) Richard (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hi [[KT]], would these entries 'abiding to non-distraction' and 'abiding to non-arising' be better stated as 'non-distracted abiding' and 'abiding '''''as''''' the nonarising of particulars and [[dharmas]] as distractions'? If I misinterpreted your inference I apologize, but the point I'm trying to make is to be as clear and concise (without being ''too'' concise) in these english definitions as possible. With the inference of abiding '''''to''''' this or that, it seems as if one would be going from one notion ''to'' another, which in meditational equipoise would merely introduce further distraction. Do you see what I mean?<br>		#redirect [[three poisons]]
	~~--[[User:Richard\|Richard]] 13:13, 6 October 2007 (EDT)~~