Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "english-comment" with value "definition of collection generality (tshogs spyi) SW: is "aggregation" better than "conglomeration" in the Eng.?". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

    

List of results

  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1765  + (one of the "Six Collections of Reasonings" (rigs tshogs drug); see rigs tshogs drug for others)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/888  + (one of the first three types of isolate phenomenon (ldog chos); for others see: ldog chos; examples are: generality of pot (bum pa'i spyi); generality of permanent phenomenon (rtag pa'i spyi); generality of consciousness (shes pa'i spyi))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1683  + (one of the five divisions of internal matter (nang gi bem po); the other four correspond to the other senses; see sna dbang for definition)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/724  + (one of the four types of isolates; for oth … one of the four types of isolates; for others see: ldog paComment: "Illustration-isolates" are conceptually isolated illustrations, that is to say, illustrations simpliciter; it is a technical term often used to refer to mere illustrations, isolated from the definition and definiendum which they illustrate.ion and definiendum which they illustrate.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/511  + (one of the three types of generality (spyi); for others see: [[spyi; see also: bum pa'i don spyi]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1841  + (one of the three types of generality; for others see: [[spyi]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/264  + (one of the two main collections of the Bodhisattva; the other is the collection of wisdom (ye shes kyi tshogs))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/244  + (one of the two types of Solitary Realizer … one of the two types of Solitary Realizer paths of no more learning the other being Solitary Realizer path of no more learning of those who previously had the realizations of congregating [Solitary Realizers] (tshogs spyod kyi rtogs pa sngon du song ba'i rang rgyal gyi mi slob lam)n du song ba'i rang rgyal gyi mi slob lam))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1775  + (one of the two types of consequences (thal 'gyur); the other is facsimile of a consequence (thal 'gyur ltar snang)\nNeed English for definition (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/546  + (one of the two types of meaning generality)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1840  + (path of accumulation; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (tshogs lam); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1842  + (path of accumulation; tshogs lam; Comment: … path of accumulation; tshogs lam; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (path of accumulation); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).nd path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1552  + (path of meditation; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (tshogs lam); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/992  + (path of no more learning; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (tshogs lam); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1510  + (path of preparation; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (tshogs lam); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1065  + (path of seeing; Comment: This is one of the five paths (lam): path of accumulation (tshogs lam); path of preparation (sbyor lam); path of seeing (mthong lam); path of meditation (sgom lam); and path of no more learning (mi slob lam).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/40  + (refers to a phenomenon which is produced in dependence upon an aggregation of causes)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1376  + (rjes su dpag pa'i tshad ma; See rjes su dpag pa'i tshad ma for definition)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1680  + (see sna dbang for definition)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1681  + (see sna shes for definition)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1742  + (see: [[spyi mtshan]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1235  + (self-isolate; one of the four types of iso … self-isolate; one of the four types of isolates; for others see: ldog paComment: The term "self-isolate" (rang ldog) is a similarly convenient way of referring just to the object itself, pot, and not any of illustrations, such as a copper pot, or its definition., such as a copper pot, or its definition.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1740  + (spyi'i mtshan nyid; Comment: This term is … spyi'i mtshan nyid; Comment: This term is used in two markedly different ways, generally characterized phenomenon and general character. Generally characterized phenomena (spyi mtshan) are solely permanent phenomena such as uncompounded space ('dus ma byas kyi nam mkha'). However, general characteristic, or general character, (spyi'i mtshan nyid) refers to a character of an object that is shared with other objects; for instance, impermanence is a general characteristic of consciousness (shes pa) and is also a general characteristic of form (gzugs). Similarly, specifically characterized phenomena (rang mtshan) are solely impermanent phenomena such as consciousness (shes pa) and form (gzugs), but the specific characteristic, or specific character, (rang gi mtshan nyid) of an object is its own definining character such as that which is luminous and knowing (gsal zhing rig pa), which is the definition of consciousness (shes pa), an impermanent phenomena; and the non-affirming negative which is a mere negation of obstructive contact (thogs reg bkag tsam gyi med dgag), which is the definition of uncompounded space, a permanent phenomena.uncompounded space, a permanent phenomena.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/525  + (ultimate truths are understood in differen … ultimate truths are understood in different ways by the various Buddhist systems; see definition headingComment: The Sanskrit for "ultimate truth," paramArthasatya, is etymologized three ways within identifying parama as "highest" or "ultimate," artha as "object," and satya as "truth." In the first way, parama (highest, ultimate) refers to a consciousness of meditative equipoise directly realizing emptiness; artha (object) refers to the object of that consciousness, emptiness; and satya (truth) also refers to emptiness in that in direct perception emptiness appears the way it exists; that is, there is no discrepancy between the mode of appearance and the mode of being. In this interpretation, a paramArthasatya is a "truth-that-is-an-object-of-the-highest-consciousness." In the second way, both parama (highest, ultimate) and artha (object) refer to a consciousness of meditative equipoise directly realizing emptiness in that, in the broadest meaning of "object," both objects and subjects are objects, and a consciousness of meditative equipoise directly realizing emptiness is the highest consciousness and thus highest object; satya (truth), as before, refers to emptiness. In this second interpretation, a paramArthasatya is an emptiness that exists the way it appears to a highest consciousness, a "truth-of-a-highest-object." In the third etymology, all three parts refer to emptiness in that an emptiness is the highest (the ultimate) and is also an object and a truth, a "truth-that-is-the-highest-object." ChandrakIrti, the chief Consequentialist, favors the third etymology in his Clear Wordsors the third etymology in his Clear Words)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/781  + (various constituents; Comment: In the seve … various constituents; Comment: In the seventh chapter of the SUtra Unraveling the Thought "various constituents" (sna tshogs pa) refers to the eighteen constituents and "manifold constituents" (khams du ma) refers to the six constituents. See also khams; khams tha dad pa; khams du ma.also khams; khams tha dad pa; khams du ma.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1236  + ((PH) Definition too long; too many synonyms)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1347  + ((PH) Jeffrey, since blo and rig pa are definition/definiendum they shouldn't be listed as synonyms, right?)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1245  + ((PH) definition too long)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1071  + ((PH) too many synonymsComment: A "definiti … (PH) too many synonymsComment: A "definition" in this the Mind-Only system is not a verbal description; it is the actual object, viewed in one way as being the meaning (don, artha) whereas the definiendum is the name (ming, nAma). In another way, the definition is viewed as a "defining property" that characterizes an object. (PH) added M-O to note. Check. Exclusive view of M-O?M-O to note. Check. Exclusive view of M-O?)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/166  + (Check definition (2nd half) is it 'grel or 'brel?? (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1203  + (Check tenses. Thumi (p.164) lists dbyi / 'byid / phyis / phyis for the verb to erase. No mention of phyi. Also, "generality" is spyi, no? (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1811  + (Collection of consciousness or marvle of consciousness ?? (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/914  + (Comment: A definition from Awareness and Knowledge is: a phenomenon that limited beings must realize definitively in dependence on a sign (tshur mthong rnams kyis thog mar rtags la brten nas nges par rtogs dgos pa'i chos).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/822  + (Comment: A subject marker in logical texts … Comment: A subject marker in logical texts. The first example given above is the definition of ldog chos phung sum tsam po ba (isolate-phenomenon-of-the-third-type), illustrations of which are dgag pa (negative phenomenon), dngos po'i spyi (generality-of-functioning-thing), etc.yi (generality-of-functioning-thing), etc.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/467  + (Comment: Arhan/ arhant (dgra bcom pa) is t … Comment: Arhan/ arhant (dgra bcom pa) is translated as "Foe Destroyer" to accord with the usual Tibetan translation of the term and to assist in capturing the flavor of oral and written traditions that frequently refer to this etymology. Arhats have overcome the foe which is the afflictive emotions (nyon mongs, kleza), the chief of which is ignorance, the conception (according to the Consequence School) that persons and phenomena are established by way of their own character.\n The Indian and Tibetan translators were also aware of the etymology of arhant as "worthy one," as they translated the name of the "founder" of the Jaina system, Arhat, as mchod 'od "Worthy of Worship" (see Jam-y#ang-shay-b#a's Great Exposition of Tenets, ka, 62a.3). Also, they were aware of ChandrakIrti's gloss of the term as "Worthy One" in his Clear Words: "Because of being worthy of worship by the world of gods, humans, and demi-gods, they are called Arhats" (sadevamAnuøAsurAl lokAt pUnArhatvAd arhannityuchyate [Poussin, 486.5], lha dang mi dang lha ma yin du bcas pa'i 'jig rten gyis mchod par 'os pas dgra bcom pa zhes brjod la [P5260, vol. 98 75.2.2]). Also, they were aware of Haribhadra's twofold etymology in his Illumination of the Eight Thousand Stanza Perfection of Wisdom SUtra. In the context of the list of epithets qualifying the retinue of Buddha at the beginning of the sUtra (see Unrai Wogihara, ed., AbhisamayAla™kArAlokA PrajJA-pAramitA-vyAkhyA, The Work of Haribhadra [Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 1932-5; reprint ed., Tokyo: Sankibo Buddhist Book Store, 1973], 8.18), Haribhadra says, "They are called arhant [=Worthy One, from root arh 'to be worthy'] since they are worthy of worship, religious donations, and being assembled together in a group, etc." (W9.8-9: sarva evAtra pUjA-dakøi˜A-ga˜a-parikarøAdy-Arhatayar-han-taH; P5189, 67.5.7: 'dir thams cad kyang mchod pa dang // yon dang tshogs su 'dub la sogs par 'os pas na dgra bcom pa'o).\nAlso, "They are called arhant [= Foe Destroyer, arihan] because they have destroyed (hata) the foe (ari)."\n(W10.18: hatAritvAd arhantaH; P5189, 69.3.6. dgra rnams bcom pas na dgra bcom pa'o). Thus, this is a considered preference in the face of alternative etymologies—"Foe Destroyer" requiring a not unusual i infix to make ari-han, ari meaning enemy and han meaning to kill, and thus "Foe Destroyer." Unfortunately, one word in English cannot convey both this meaning and "Worthy of Worship"; thus, I have gone with what clearly has become the predominant meaning in Tibet. (For an excellent discussion of the two etymologies of "Arhat" in Buddhism and Jainism, see L.M. Joshi's "Facets of Jaina Religiousness in Comparative Light," L.D. Series 85, [Ahmedabad: L.D. Institute of Indology, May 1981], 53-58). Institute of Indology, May 1981], 53-58).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1647  + (Comment: Definition of compounded phenomenon ('dus byas kyi chos).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1646  + (Comment: Definition of uncompounded phenomenon ('dus ma byas kyi chos).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1589  + (Comment: For a definition of person who is a collective/complete/holistic engager, see sgrub 'jug gi blo.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1587  + (Comment: For a definition, see sgro 'dogs.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/853  + (Comment: In the SUtra School Following Rea … Comment: In the SUtra School Following Reasoning the following are equivalent: conventional truth (kun rdzob bden pa); permanent phenomenon (rtag pa); generally characterized phenomenon (spyi mtshan); phenomenon which is not a [functioning] thing (dngos med kyi chos); uncompounded phenomenon ('dus ma byas kyi chos); unproduced phenomenon (ma byas pa'i chos).unproduced phenomenon (ma byas pa'i chos).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/850  + (Comment: In the SUtra School Following Rea … Comment: In the SUtra School Following Reasoning the following are equivalent: conventional truth (kun rdzob bden pa); permanent phenomenon (rtag pa); generally characterized phenomenon (spyi mtshan); phenomenon which is not a [functioning] thing (dngos med kyi chos); uncompounded phenomenon ('dus ma byas kyi chos); unproduced phenomenon (ma byas pa'i chos).unproduced phenomenon (ma byas pa'i chos).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1527  + (Comment: In the division into four, the fi … Comment: In the division into four, the first refers to the mind-generations of the paths of accumulation (tshogs lam) and preparation (sbyor lam), the second to the mind-generations of the first seven grounds of Bodhisattva Superiors, the third to the mind-generations of the eighth, ninth, and tenth grounds of Bodhisattva Superiors, and the fourth to the mind-generations of Buddhas.fourth to the mind-generations of Buddhas.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/614  + (Comment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymolo … Comment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymologized this is "full-fall", i.e., one who is filled with the afflictions and has fallen into cyclic existence. As he said, this is not true of all persons, because even a Buddha, for instance, is a person. It is to be noted that animals, for instance, are persons. It is said that in general "self" (bdag, Atman) "person," and "I" (nga, ahaM) are equivalent, but in the particular context of the selflessness of persons "self" and "person" are not at all equivalent and do not at all have the same meaning. In the term "selflessness of persons," "self" refers to a falsely imagined status that needs to be refuted, whereas "persons" refers to existent beings who are the bases with respect to which that refutation is made. All four Buddhist schools, therefore, hold that persons exist; they do not claim that persons are mere fictions of ignorance. The schools hold differing opinions on the nature of the person. According to Ge-luk-b#a scholars, all except the Middle Way Consequence School posit something from within the bases of imputation of a person — usually either mind or the collection of mind and body — as being the person. In contrast, the Consequence School holds that, even though a person is imputed in dependence upon mind and body (in the Formless Realm, a person is imputed in dependence only on mind), the person is neither mind nor body nor a collection of mind and body, since it is just the I that is imputed in dependence upon mind and body. Following the lead of ChandrakIrti, recognized by most as the founder of the Consequence School, Ge-luk-b#a scholars identify how in the other schools some factor among the five aggregates (forms, feelings, discriminations, compositional factors, and consciousnesses) or the collection of them is considered to be the person when sought analytically from among its bases of imputation: the Proponents of the Great Exposition, in general, hold that the mere collection of the mental and physical aggregates is the person; however, some of the five SaMmitIya subschools of the Great Exposition School maintain that all five aggregates are the person (although the absurdity of one person being five persons would seem difficult not to notice) while another subschool, the Avantaka, asserts that the mind alone is the person; the SUtra School Following Scripture assert that the continuum of the aggregates is the person; the SUtra School Following Reasoning maintains that the mental consciousness is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Scripture holds that the mind-basis-of-all (kun gzhi rnam par shes pa, AlayavijJAna) is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Reasoning asserts that the mental consciousness is the person; both the Yogic Autonomy School and the SUtra Autonomy School assert that a subtle, neutral mental consciousness is the person. For the most part, the delineation of what these schools assert to be the person is a matter of conjecture and not reporting of forthright statements in these schools' own texts. Though it is clear that most of these schools (if not all) accept that persons exist, it is often not clear in their own literature that they assert that something from within the bases of imputation of a person is the person. Rather, as presented in Vasubandhu's commentary on the ninth chapter of his Treasury of Manifest Knowledge, persons are merely asserted to be "non-associated compositional factors" (ldan min 'du byed, viprayuktasaMskAra) and thus an instance of the fourth aggregate, compositional factors, without a specific identification — of any of the five aggregates that are a person's bases of imputation — as the person.son's bases of imputation — as the person.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/807  + (Comment: Pervader is a definition of generality (spyi).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/780  + (Comment: See also khams; khams du ma; khams sna tshogs pa.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1658  + (Comment: That which is created is the definition of product (byas pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1640  + (Comment: That which is momentary (skad cig ma) is the definition of impermanent phenomenon (mi rtag pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/806  + (Comment: That which is pervaded is the definition of instance/particular (bye brag). See also khyab byed du 'jug pa'i rang gi rigs yod pa can gyi chos; khyab byed.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/257  + (Comment: That which is produced is the definition of effect ('bras bu).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1656  + (Comment: That which produces is the definition of cause (rgyu).)
Retrieved from "https://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/Special:SearchByProperty/:english-2Dcomment/definition-20of-20collection-20generality-20(tshogs-20spyi)-20SW:-20is-20%22aggregation%22-20better-20than-20%22conglomeration%22-20in-20the-20Eng.-3F"