Search by property

Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

Search by property

A list of all pages that have property "english-comment" with value "one of the five spanisions of internal matter (nang gi bem po); the other four correspond to the other senses". Since there have been only a few results, also nearby values are displayed.

Showing below up to 26 results starting with #1.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)


    

List of results

  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/938  + (one of the five types of sense powers; the others correspond to the other senses; see: [[dbang po]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/919  + (one of the seven divisions of knowledge and awareness (blo rig); for others see: [[blo rig]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1002  + (one of the six divisions of ordinary beings (so so'i skye bo, pRthagjana); for others see: see [[dmyal ba'i rten can gyi so so'i skye bo]])
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/986  + (one of the three divisions of knowledge and awareness (blo rig) according to the three-fold division)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1478  + (one of the two divisions of color; the other is: secondary colors (yan lag gi kha dog, aGga-varNa))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/398  + (one of the two divisions of consciousness (shes pa); the other is mental cognition (yid shes))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/421  + (one of the two divisions of form-source (gzugs kyi skye mched, rUpAyatana); the other is color (kha dog))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1211  + (one of the two divisions of matter (bem po); the other being: internal matter (nang gi bem po); illustrations are: (1) pillar (ka ba); (2) pot (bum pa))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/984  + (one of the two divisions of negation (dgagone of the two divisions of negation (dgag pa); the other is: affirming negative (ma yin dgag, paryudAsa-pratiSedha)Comment: The division of negatives, or negations, into affirming and non-affirming, or implicative and non-implicative, is traced to MimAMsA injunctions to refrain from activities that either imply another activity in its place or not. For example, the non-existence of the horns of a rabbit is expressed by the sentence, "The horns of a rabbit do not exist," and this does not suggest anything positive in place of the horns of a rabbit. Though it can suggest another non-affirming negative such as the non-existence of the beauty of the horns of a rabbit, it does not suggest any positive phenomenon in place of its object of negation. In the same way, an emptiness is a non-affirming negative such that the term expressing it does not suggest in place of the negation of its own object of negation another, positive phenomenon. See also "affirming negation" (ma yin dgag).e also "affirming negation" (ma yin dgag).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1290  + (one of the two divisions of one type (rigs gcig); the other is: one isolate type (ldog pa rigs gcig))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/955  + (one of the two divisions of sound-source (sgra'i skye mched, zabdAyatana); the other is: sound arisen from elements conjoined with consciousness (zin pa'i 'byung ba las gyur pa'i sgra, upatta-mahAbhUta-hetuka-zabda))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/15  + (one of the two divisions of tangible object (reg bya, spraSTavya); the other is: tangible object which is an element ('byung bar gyur pa'i reg bya))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/17  + (one of the two divisions of tangible object (reg bya, spraSTavya); the other is: tangible object that is arisen from elements ('byung 'gyur gyi reg bya))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/716  + (other-knower; an other-knower is a consciousness which engages external objects (i.e. objects other than internal consciousnesses))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1350  + (rig gnas; rig gnas chung ba lnga need to be translated SW added divisions, from Tshig mdzod 2 vol. 2682.1; ex. from Ship 61b.3)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1007  + (see: mig shes\nNot sure what divisions mean?? (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1577  + (sound sense-sphere; Comment: This is one osound sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1301  + (tangible object sense-sphere; Comment: Thitangible object sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1454  + (taste sense-sphere; Comment: This is one otaste sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1738  + (the style of textbook which lays out the subject, definitions, divisions, etc. as opposed to analysis of the scope (mtha' dpyad))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/404  + (the two divisions of consciousness (shes pa))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/952  + (the two divisions of negative (dgag pa, pratiSedha))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1582  + (those whose obstruction is external; Commethose whose obstruction is external; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1580  + (those whose obstruction is internal; Commethose whose obstruction is internal; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1584  + (those whose obstructions are both externalthose whose obstructions are both external and internal; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1849  + ((PH) Jeffrey, Perdue gives divisions as "1) the property of the subject (pakSa-dharma), 2) the forward pervasion (anvaya-vyApti), 3) the counter-pervasion (vyatireka-vyApti)")
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1513  + ((PH) Jeffrey, there are too many entries in the Divisions field)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/478  + ((PH) Tib. divisions too long.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/723  + ((PH) too many divisions)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1006  + (Check divisions (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/397  + (Check divisions, I doctored them (T))
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/671  + (Comment: A non-Buddhist school renowned inComment: A non-Buddhist school renowned in Buddhist texts as the precursor of all Indian systems and so called due to the belief that liberation can be gained through thoroughly understanding the enumeration of twenty-five categories of objects of knowledge which principally involves distinguishing between mind and twentt-four categories of matter.mind and twentt-four categories of matter.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/879  + (Comment: Examples of this include wide catComment: Examples of this include wide categories which cannot be tied down to being just matter or just consciousness, such as thing (dngos po), specifically characterized phenomenon (rang mtshan), that which is able to perform a function (don byed nus pa).e to perform a function (don byed nus pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/771  + (Comment: For divisions see nye nyon.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/778  + (Comment: For other divisions see khams du ma and khams tha dad pa.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/505  + (Comment: In Jo-nang non-entities here are imputational natures, which include other-powered natures, and thus are all conventionalities.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/502  + (Comment: In Jo-nang non-entities here are imputational natures, which include other-powered natures, and thus are all conventionalities.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/504  + (Comment: In Jo-nang, this is the emptiness of imputational natures which here include other-powered natures.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/614  + (Comment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymoloComment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymologized this is "full-fall", i.e., one who is filled with the afflictions and has fallen into cyclic existence. As he said, this is not true of all persons, because even a Buddha, for instance, is a person. It is to be noted that animals, for instance, are persons. It is said that in general "self" (bdag, Atman) "person," and "I" (nga, ahaM) are equivalent, but in the particular context of the selflessness of persons "self" and "person" are not at all equivalent and do not at all have the same meaning. In the term "selflessness of persons," "self" refers to a falsely imagined status that needs to be refuted, whereas "persons" refers to existent beings who are the bases with respect to which that refutation is made. All four Buddhist schools, therefore, hold that persons exist; they do not claim that persons are mere fictions of ignorance. The schools hold differing opinions on the nature of the person. According to Ge-luk-b#a scholars, all except the Middle Way Consequence School posit something from within the bases of imputation of a person — usually either mind or the collection of mind and body — as being the person. In contrast, the Consequence School holds that, even though a person is imputed in dependence upon mind and body (in the Formless Realm, a person is imputed in dependence only on mind), the person is neither mind nor body nor a collection of mind and body, since it is just the I that is imputed in dependence upon mind and body. Following the lead of ChandrakIrti, recognized by most as the founder of the Consequence School, Ge-luk-b#a scholars identify how in the other schools some factor among the five aggregates (forms, feelings, discriminations, compositional factors, and consciousnesses) or the collection of them is considered to be the person when sought analytically from among its bases of imputation: the Proponents of the Great Exposition, in general, hold that the mere collection of the mental and physical aggregates is the person; however, some of the five SaMmitIya subschools of the Great Exposition School maintain that all five aggregates are the person (although the absurdity of one person being five persons would seem difficult not to notice) while another subschool, the Avantaka, asserts that the mind alone is the person; the SUtra School Following Scripture assert that the continuum of the aggregates is the person; the SUtra School Following Reasoning maintains that the mental consciousness is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Scripture holds that the mind-basis-of-all (kun gzhi rnam par shes pa, AlayavijJAna) is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Reasoning asserts that the mental consciousness is the person; both the Yogic Autonomy School and the SUtra Autonomy School assert that a subtle, neutral mental consciousness is the person. For the most part, the delineation of what these schools assert to be the person is a matter of conjecture and not reporting of forthright statements in these schools' own texts. Though it is clear that most of these schools (if not all) accept that persons exist, it is often not clear in their own literature that they assert that something from within the bases of imputation of a person is the person. Rather, as presented in Vasubandhu's commentary on the ninth chapter of his Treasury of Manifest Knowledge, persons are merely asserted to be "non-associated compositional factors" (ldan min 'du byed, viprayuktasaMskAra) and thus an instance of the fourth aggregate, compositional factors, without a specific identification — of any of the five aggregates that are a person's bases of imputation — as the person.son's bases of imputation — as the person.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/374  + (Comment: One in the triad of imputational Comment: One in the triad of imputational form (kun brtags pa'i gzugs), imputed form (rnam par brtags pa'i gzugs), and form of reality (chos nyid kyi gzugs), the last meaning the reality of form in Ge-luk and noumenal form in Jo-nang. These three correspond to the three natures of a form: imputational nature, other-powered nature, and thoroughly established nature of a form.d thoroughly established nature of a form.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1331  + (Comment: One of the five kinds of effects ('bras bu). With respect to the divisions, the first would, for instance, be to kill and to be killed; the second would, for instance, be to kill and then to kill again.)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/646  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of mi (humans), the other being humans of the four continents (gling bzhi'i mi).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/647  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of mi (humans), the other being humans of the eight small continents (gling phran brgyad kyi mi).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/620  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/621  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/776  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of animals (dud 'gro), the other being those living in the depths (bying na gnas pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/622  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/445  + (Comment: Positive and negative phenomena are one of the divisions of gzhi grub (established base), i.e., existents (yod pa).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/455  + (Comment: The three are dge ba (virtue), mi dge ba (non-virtue), and lung du ma bstan pa (neutral); this is one of the divisions of established base (gzhi grub).)
  • Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/764  + (Comment: There are outer (phyi), inner (nang), and alternative (gzhan) KAlacakras, these being the cosmology, the structure of mind and body, and the path-structure, respectively.)