Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1290  + (one of the two divisions of one type (rigs gcig); the other is: one isolate type (ldog pa rigs gcig))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/955  + (one of the two divisions of sound-source (sgra'i skye mched, zabdAyatana); the other is: sound arisen from elements conjoined with consciousness (zin pa'i 'byung ba las gyur pa'i sgra, upatta-mahAbhUta-hetuka-zabda))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/15  + (one of the two divisions of tangible object (reg bya, spraSTavya); the other is: tangible object which is an element ('byung bar gyur pa'i reg bya))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/17  + (one of the two divisions of tangible object (reg bya, spraSTavya); the other is: tangible object that is arisen from elements ('byung 'gyur gyi reg bya))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/364  + (phenomenon-constituent; Comment: Among the … phenomenon-constituent; Comment: Among the eighteen constituents, the "phenomenon-constituent" contains all phenomena not included in the other constituents, and thus all permanent phenomena, including thusness, or emptiness, are contained therein. Since all eighteen constituents are said to be bases of emptiness, thusness itself, or emptiness, must also be a basis of emptiness. The same is so for the phenomenon-sense-sphere (chos kyi skye mched, dharmAyatana) among the twelve sense-spheres.rmAyatana) among the twelve sense-spheres.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/62  + (production in three types; Comment: This i … production in three types; Comment: This is one of the three assertions concerning mental direct perceptions indicated on this occasion (skabs 'dir bstan gyi yid mngon): production only at the end of a continuum (rgyun mtha' kho nar skye ba); alternating production (spel mar skye ba); and production in three types ('gros gsum par skye ba).n in three types ('gros gsum par skye ba).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1342  + (production only at the end of a continuum; … production only at the end of a continuum; Comment: This is one of the three assertions concerning mental direct perceptions indicated on this occasion (skabs 'dir bstan gyi yid mngon): production only at the end of a continuum (rgyun mtha' kho nar skye ba); alternating production (spel mar skye ba); and production in three types ('gros gsum par skye ba).n in three types ('gros gsum par skye ba).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1350  + (rig gnas; rig gnas chung ba lnga need to be translated SW added divisions, from Tshig mdzod 2 vol. 2682.1; ex. from Ship 61b.3)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/487  + (see: [[dmyal ba]])
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/488  + (see: [[dmyal ba]])
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/485  + (see: [[dmyal ba]])
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1712  + (see: [[so so'i skye bo]])
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1718  + (see: [[so so'i skye bo]])
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1007  + (see: mig shes\nNot sure what divisions mean?? (T))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1577  + (sound sense-sphere; Comment: This is one o … sound sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1301  + (tangible object sense-sphere; Comment: Thi … tangible object sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1454  + (taste sense-sphere; Comment: This is one o … taste sense-sphere; Comment: This is one of the five divisions of external form (phyi'i gzugs): form sense-sphere (gzugs kyi skye mched); (2) sound sense-sphere (sgra'i skye mched); (3) odor sense-sphere (dri'i skye mched); (4) taste sense-sphere (ro'i skye mched); (5) tangible object sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).bject sense-sphere (reg bya'i skye mched).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1738  + (the style of textbook which lays out the subject, definitions, divisions, etc. as opposed to analysis of the scope (mtha' dpyad))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/404  + (the two divisions of consciousness (shes pa))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/952  + (the two divisions of negative (dgag pa, pratiSedha))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1582  + (those whose obstruction is external; Comme … those whose obstruction is external; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1580  + (those whose obstruction is internal; Comme … those whose obstruction is internal; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1584  + (those whose obstructions are both external … those whose obstructions are both external and internal; Comment: This is one of the three divisions of hungry ghost (yi dwags, preta): those whose obstruction is external (sgrib pa phyi na yod pa); those whose obstruction is internal (sgrib pa nang na yod pa); those whose obstructions are both external and internal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).rnal (sgrib pa phyi nang gnyis ka yod pa).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1652  + (utpattiniHsvabhAvatA; Comment: This is one … utpattiniHsvabhAvatA; Comment: This is one of the three non-natures: character-non-nature (mtshan nyid ngo bo nyid med pa, utpattiniHsvabhAvatA); production-non-nature (skye ba ngo bo nyid med pa, utpattiniHsvabhAvatA); ultimate-non-nature (don dam pa ngo bo nyid med pa, paramArthaniHsvabhAvatA). bo nyid med pa, paramArthaniHsvabhAvatA).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1651  + (utpattiniHsvabhAvatA; Comment: This is one … utpattiniHsvabhAvatA; Comment: This is one of the three non-natures: character-non-nature (mtshan nyid ngo bo nyid med pa, utpattiniHsvabhAvatA); production-non-nature (skye ba ngo bo nyid med pa, utpattiniHsvabhAvatA); ultimate-non-nature (don dam pa ngo bo nyid med pa, paramArthaniHsvabhAvatA). bo nyid med pa, paramArthaniHsvabhAvatA).)

• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1002  + (one of the six divisions of ordinary beings (so so'i skye bo, pRthagjana); for others see: see [[dmyal ba'i rten can gyi so so'i skye bo]])

• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1849  + ((PH) Jeffrey, Perdue gives divisions as "1) the property of the subject (pakSa-dharma), 2) the forward pervasion (anvaya-vyApti), 3) the counter-pervasion (vyatireka-vyApti)")
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1513  + ((PH) Jeffrey, there are too many entries in the Divisions field)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/478  + ((PH) Tib. divisions too long.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/723  + ((PH) too many divisions)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1006  + (Check divisions (T))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/397  + (Check divisions, I doctored them (T))
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/914  + (Comment: A definition from Awareness and Knowledge is: a phenomenon that limited beings must realize definitively in dependence on a sign (tshur mthong rnams kyis thog mar rtags la brten nas nges par rtogs dgos pa'i chos).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1643  + (Comment: A possible etymology is that there are nine levels of beings in cyclic existence, and thus "nine-creatures" comes to mean all beings in cyclic existence.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1062  + (Comment: A syncretic system propounded by Dol-b#o-b#a S#hay-rap-gyel-tsen. Synonyms include Ultimate Mind-Only (don dam pa'i sems tsam), Great Middle Way (dbu ma chen po), and Supramundane Mind-Only ('jig rten las 'das pa'i sems tsam).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/515  + (Comment: A syncretic system propounded by Dol-b#o-b#a S#hay-rap-gyel-tsen. Synonyms include Great Middle Way (dbu ma chen po), Final Mind-Only (mthar thug gi sems tsam), and Supramundane Mind-Only ('jig rten las 'das pa'i sems tsam).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/415  + (Comment: A syncretic system propounded by … Comment: A syncretic system propounded by Dol-b#o-b#a S#hay-rap-gyel-tsen. Synonyms include Ultimate Mind-Only (don dam pa'i sems tsam), Final Mind-Only (mthar thug gi sems tsam), and Supramundane Mind-Only ('jig rten las 'das pa'i sems tsam). (PH) added this note here & in synonyms. check added this note here & in synonyms. check)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/467  + (Comment: Arhan/ arhant (dgra bcom pa) is t … Comment: Arhan/ arhant (dgra bcom pa) is translated as "Foe Destroyer" to accord with the usual Tibetan translation of the term and to assist in capturing the flavor of oral and written traditions that frequently refer to this etymology. Arhats have overcome the foe which is the afflictive emotions (nyon mongs, kleza), the chief of which is ignorance, the conception (according to the Consequence School) that persons and phenomena are established by way of their own character.\n The Indian and Tibetan translators were also aware of the etymology of arhant as "worthy one," as they translated the name of the "founder" of the Jaina system, Arhat, as mchod 'od "Worthy of Worship" (see Jam-y#ang-shay-b#a's Great Exposition of Tenets, ka, 62a.3). Also, they were aware of ChandrakIrti's gloss of the term as "Worthy One" in his Clear Words: "Because of being worthy of worship by the world of gods, humans, and demi-gods, they are called Arhats" (sadevamAnuøAsurAl lokAt pUnArhatvAd arhannityuchyate [Poussin, 486.5], lha dang mi dang lha ma yin du bcas pa'i 'jig rten gyis mchod par 'os pas dgra bcom pa zhes brjod la [P5260, vol. 98 75.2.2]). Also, they were aware of Haribhadra's twofold etymology in his Illumination of the Eight Thousand Stanza Perfection of Wisdom SUtra. In the context of the list of epithets qualifying the retinue of Buddha at the beginning of the sUtra (see Unrai Wogihara, ed., AbhisamayAla™kArAlokA PrajJA-pAramitA-vyAkhyA, The Work of Haribhadra [Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 1932-5; reprint ed., Tokyo: Sankibo Buddhist Book Store, 1973], 8.18), Haribhadra says, "They are called arhant [=Worthy One, from root arh 'to be worthy'] since they are worthy of worship, religious donations, and being assembled together in a group, etc." (W9.8-9: sarva evAtra pUjA-dakøi˜A-ga˜a-parikarøAdy-Arhatayar-han-taH; P5189, 67.5.7: 'dir thams cad kyang mchod pa dang // yon dang tshogs su 'dub la sogs par 'os pas na dgra bcom pa'o).\nAlso, "They are called arhant [= Foe Destroyer, arihan] because they have destroyed (hata) the foe (ari)."\n(W10.18: hatAritvAd arhantaH; P5189, 69.3.6. dgra rnams bcom pas na dgra bcom pa'o). Thus, this is a considered preference in the face of alternative etymologies—"Foe Destroyer" requiring a not unusual i infix to make ari-han, ari meaning enemy and han meaning to kill, and thus "Foe Destroyer." Unfortunately, one word in English cannot convey both this meaning and "Worthy of Worship"; thus, I have gone with what clearly has become the predominant meaning in Tibet. (For an excellent discussion of the two etymologies of "Arhat" in Buddhism and Jainism, see L.M. Joshi's "Facets of Jaina Religiousness in Comparative Light," L.D. Series 85, [Ahmedabad: L.D. Institute of Indology, May 1981], 53-58). Institute of Indology, May 1981], 53-58).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/816  + (Comment: As in "Form is produced " (gzugs skye'o); see MO, 105.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/818  + (Comment: As in "Form is produced momentarily" (gzugs skad cig la skye'o); see MO, 105.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/771  + (Comment: For divisions see nye nyon.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/778  + (Comment: For other divisions see khams du ma and khams tha dad pa.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1250  + (Comment: In the GuhyasamAja system of High … Comment: In the GuhyasamAja system of Highest Yoga Tantra as presented in NAgArjuna's Five Stages (rim pa lnga pa, paJcakrama), conceptual consciousnesses are detailed as of eighty types, divided into three classes. The first group of thirty-three is composed of conceptual consciousnesses that involve a strong movement of "wind" to their objects. They include conceptions such as fear, attachment, hunger, thirst, compassion, acquisitiveness, and jealousy. The second group of forty conceptions is composed of conceptual consciousnesses that involve a medium movement of "wind" to their objects — conceptions such as joy, amazement, generosity, desiring to kiss, heroism, non-gentleness, and crookedness. The third group of seven conceptions involve a weak movement of "wind" to their objects — forgetfulness, mistake as in apprehending water in a mirage, catatonia, depression, laziness, doubt, and equal desire and hatred. The three groups represent, on the ordinary level of consciousness, increasingly less dualistic perception; it is clear that in the third group the mind is strongly withdrawn. They are called "indicative" because, for someone who has not experienced the three subtler levels of consciousness--mind of vivid white appearance, mind of vivid red or organge increase, and mind of black near-attainment (so called because it is near to manifesting the mind of clear light), these indicate what these consciousnesses are like.icate what these consciousnesses are like.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/614  + (Comment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymolo … Comment: Ken-sur Nga-w#ang-lek-den etymologized this is "full-fall", i.e., one who is filled with the afflictions and has fallen into cyclic existence. As he said, this is not true of all persons, because even a Buddha, for instance, is a person. It is to be noted that animals, for instance, are persons. It is said that in general "self" (bdag, Atman) "person," and "I" (nga, ahaM) are equivalent, but in the particular context of the selflessness of persons "self" and "person" are not at all equivalent and do not at all have the same meaning. In the term "selflessness of persons," "self" refers to a falsely imagined status that needs to be refuted, whereas "persons" refers to existent beings who are the bases with respect to which that refutation is made. All four Buddhist schools, therefore, hold that persons exist; they do not claim that persons are mere fictions of ignorance. The schools hold differing opinions on the nature of the person. According to Ge-luk-b#a scholars, all except the Middle Way Consequence School posit something from within the bases of imputation of a person — usually either mind or the collection of mind and body — as being the person. In contrast, the Consequence School holds that, even though a person is imputed in dependence upon mind and body (in the Formless Realm, a person is imputed in dependence only on mind), the person is neither mind nor body nor a collection of mind and body, since it is just the I that is imputed in dependence upon mind and body. Following the lead of ChandrakIrti, recognized by most as the founder of the Consequence School, Ge-luk-b#a scholars identify how in the other schools some factor among the five aggregates (forms, feelings, discriminations, compositional factors, and consciousnesses) or the collection of them is considered to be the person when sought analytically from among its bases of imputation: the Proponents of the Great Exposition, in general, hold that the mere collection of the mental and physical aggregates is the person; however, some of the five SaMmitIya subschools of the Great Exposition School maintain that all five aggregates are the person (although the absurdity of one person being five persons would seem difficult not to notice) while another subschool, the Avantaka, asserts that the mind alone is the person; the SUtra School Following Scripture assert that the continuum of the aggregates is the person; the SUtra School Following Reasoning maintains that the mental consciousness is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Scripture holds that the mind-basis-of-all (kun gzhi rnam par shes pa, AlayavijJAna) is the person; the Mind-Only School Following Reasoning asserts that the mental consciousness is the person; both the Yogic Autonomy School and the SUtra Autonomy School assert that a subtle, neutral mental consciousness is the person. For the most part, the delineation of what these schools assert to be the person is a matter of conjecture and not reporting of forthright statements in these schools' own texts. Though it is clear that most of these schools (if not all) accept that persons exist, it is often not clear in their own literature that they assert that something from within the bases of imputation of a person is the person. Rather, as presented in Vasubandhu's commentary on the ninth chapter of his Treasury of Manifest Knowledge, persons are merely asserted to be "non-associated compositional factors" (ldan min 'du byed, viprayuktasaMskAra) and thus an instance of the fourth aggregate, compositional factors, without a specific identification — of any of the five aggregates that are a person's bases of imputation — as the person.son's bases of imputation — as the person.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/1331  + (Comment: One of the five kinds of effects ('bras bu). With respect to the divisions, the first would, for instance, be to kill and to be killed; the second would, for instance, be to kill and then to kill again.)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/646  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of mi (humans), the other being humans of the four continents (gling bzhi'i mi).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/620  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/647  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of mi (humans), the other being humans of the eight small continents (gling phran brgyad kyi mi).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/621  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/622  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of non-associated compositional factors (ldan min 'du byed).)
• Steinert App Dictionaries/06-Hopkins-Comment/776  + (Comment: One of the two divisions of animals (dud 'gro), the other being those living in the depths (bying na gnas pa).)