gotrabhū (5857)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(CSV import BHS Import part 1) |
m (Text replacement - "\<k1>(.*)\<k2>(.*)\<br>" to "($1, $2)<br>") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|bhs-page-num=216 | |bhs-page-num=216 | ||
|bhs-column-num=1 | |bhs-column-num=1 | ||
|bhs-entry= | |bhs-entry=(gotraBU, gotraBU)<br><b>gotrabhū</b>¦, f. (cf. Pali id., <i>a member of the religious</i> <i>communion</i>, see s.v. <b>gotra, 1</b>), in Laṅk 266.2 āśritā sarva- bhūteṣu gotrabhūs tarkavarjitā, nivartate kriyāmuktā jñānajñeyavivarjitā, apparently a fem. collective or abstract, <i>the ‘communion of saints’</i>, corresponding to the [Page216-b+ 71] Pali masc. which refers to an individual person. Suzuki, <i>the original source</i>, which is certainly impossible; the word must have some relation to the Pali word, on which see especially Childers, and Lévi, Sūtrāl. iii.1, note. | ||
<b>gotrabhū</b>¦, f. (cf. Pali id., <i>a member of the religious</i> <i>communion</i>, see s.v. <b>gotra, 1</b>), in Laṅk 266.2 āśritā sarva- bhūteṣu gotrabhūs tarkavarjitā, nivartate kriyāmuktā jñānajñeyavivarjitā, apparently a fem. collective or abstract, <i>the ‘communion of saints’</i>, corresponding to the [Page216-b+ 71] Pali masc. which refers to an individual person. Suzuki, <i>the original source</i>, which is certainly impossible; the word must have some relation to the Pali word, on which see especially Childers, and Lévi, Sūtrāl. iii.1, note. | |dictionary=Edgerton Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Dictionary | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:43, 15 September 2021
- gotrabhū
Entry 5857, Page 216, Col. 1 -
(gotraBU, gotraBU)
gotrabhū¦, f. (cf. Pali id., a member of the religious communion, see s.v. gotra, 1), in Laṅk 266.2 āśritā sarva- bhūteṣu gotrabhūs tarkavarjitā, nivartate kriyāmuktā jñānajñeyavivarjitā, apparently a fem. collective or abstract, the ‘communion of saints’, corresponding to the [Page216-b+ 71] Pali masc. which refers to an individual person. Suzuki, the original source, which is certainly impossible; the word must have some relation to the Pali word, on which see especially Childers, and Lévi, Sūtrāl. iii.1, note.
{{#arraymap:
|; |@@@ | | }}