three obscurations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:[Erik:] I always understood that the first connotation was its function while the second was its identity. Therefore, to translate something as "that which does such and such" could be correct, but then again, what would "obstructions to omniscience" be in Tibetan? | :[Erik:] I always understood that the first connotation was its function while the second was its identity. Therefore, to translate something as "that which does such and such" could be correct, but then again, what would "obstructions to omniscience" be in Tibetan? | ||
:[Erik]: PS. Now where is Zenkar Rinpoche's dictionary of the eight practice lineages? | |||
Revision as of 00:53, 15 January 2006
Erik, The term shes sgrib seems to have two connotations:
1. obstruction to omniscience (is the shes bya here referring to "what is to be known", i.e., omniscience?)
2. cognitive obscuration (is the shes bya here referring to cognition and thus taken in a negative sense?)
I've always been puzzled by this.
Thanks, --Gerry
- [Erik:] I always understood that the first connotation was its function while the second was its identity. Therefore, to translate something as "that which does such and such" could be correct, but then again, what would "obstructions to omniscience" be in Tibetan?
- [Erik]: PS. Now where is Zenkar Rinpoche's dictionary of the eight practice lineages?