Property:english-comment
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a property of type Text.
S
one of the three types [according to one division] of direct perceiver arisen from another (gzhan las nges kyi tshad ma) +
(PH) The entry in (GD:482) is actually mistaken. The passage says "...rtogs pa can" but should read "...rtogs med" +
Comment: This is one of the two types of conceptual subsequent cognition (rtog pa bcad shes): conceptual subsequent cognition induced by direct perception (mngon sum gis drangs pa'i rtog pa bcad shes), an illustration of which is fix; and conceptual subsequent cognition induced by inference, an illustration of which is the second moment of an inference realizing that sound is impermanent (sgra mi rtag rtogs kyi rjes dpag skad cig gnyis pa). +
direct subsequent cognizer; one of the two types of subsequent cognizer (bcad shes), the other being conceptual direct subsequent cognizer (rtog pa bcad shes) +
For synonyms and examples see: [[dngos po]] +
one of the two types of direct perceiver (tshad ma), the other being inferential direct perceiver (rjes su dpag pa'i tshad ma) +
Comment: a little bigger than a dog, has very bright fur, and moves in packs with the animals jumping back and forth over each other +
Comment: definition of manifest phenomenon (mngon gyur) in Established Base (gzhi grub)\nCheck English (T) Is object of cognition the English of "rtogs par bya ba"? (SW) +
Comment: An instance of this is a conceptual consciousness wishing for a future object at the present time (de ring gi dus su ma 'ongs pa'i don mngon par 'dod pa'i rtog pa). This is one of the seven types of facsimiles of direct perception (mngon sum ltar snang): mistaken conceptions ('khrul ba'i rtog pa), conventional conceptions (kun rdzob kyi rtog pa), inferential conceptions (rjes dpag gi rtog pa), conceptions arisen from inference (rjes dpag las byung ba'i rtog pa), memory conceptions (dran pa'i rtog pa), wishing conceptions (mngon 'dod kyi rtog pa), and non-conceptual facsimilies of direct perception (rtog med mngon sum ltar snang). +
Comment: This comes from systems that hold that even during direction perception of emptiness the phenomena qualified by emptiness still appear. +
Comment: This comes from systems that hold that the objects qualified by emptiness do not appear during meditative equipoise. (PH) I added the English contextually from the previous entry. +
Comment: dgongs pa (abhiprAyA) is often mistranslated as "intention," but this does not accord with the following:\nFour Thoughts\nThinking of sameness (mnyam pa nyid la dgongs pa, samatAbhiprAya)\nThinking of another meaning (don gzhan la dgongs pa, arthAntarAbhiprAya)\nThinking of another time (dus gzhan la dgongs pa, kAlAntarAbhiprAya)\nThinking of a person's attitude (gang zag gi bsam pa la dgongs pa, pudgalAntarAbhiprAya)\n\nFour Intentions:\nIntending entry [into the teaching] (gzhug pa la ldem por dgongs pa, avatAranAbhisaMdhi)\nIntending the [three] characters (mtshan nyid la ldem por dgongs pa, lakSaNAbhisaMdhi)\nIntending an antidote (gnyen po la ldem por dgongs pa, pratipakSAbhisaMdhi)\nIntending translation (sbyor ba la ldem por dgongs pa/ bsgyur ba la ldem por dgongs pa, pariNAmAbhisaMdhi)\n\n"Thought" (dgongs pa) is [posited] from the viewpoint of indicating the basis in [Buddha's] thought, "Thinking of this, [such and such] was said," and "intention" (ldem dgongs) is [posited] from the viewpoint of indicating purpose, "[Such and such] was said for this purpose." Since thought and intention are posited in different ways with respect to one non-literal sUtra, [a sUtra having an] intention and [a sUtra having a] thought must be asserted as mutually inclusive. The basis in [Buddha's] thought is just what the Teacher has set in [his] mind and is not relative to another, the trainee, and purpose definitely must rely on another, the trainee, since it is for sake of taking care of another. See Ann, dngos, 134.5. +
See: [[nyan thos kyi sgom lam bar chad med lam]] +
a type of dumplings with meat inside\nIs this spelt "mog mog" ? (T) +
(PH) Clark's _The Quintessence Tantras_ (p.194) identifies mon sne as "the dark read 'New Year' flower (mon chenopodium)" Add? *Note: lo gsar me tog added with same content. +
see: [[mos pa]] +
one of the five determining mental factors (yul nges lnga, paJca viSaya-pratiniyama); for others see: [[yul nges]] +
one of the two types of fruitional cause (rnam smin kyi rgyu); the other is completing karma (rdzogs byed kyi las) +
see: [[mos spyod pa'i sa]] +
see: [[mos spyod pa'i sa]] +