Difference between revisions of "bden gnyis bden stong du ngo bo dbyer med pas ngo bo gcig"

From Rangjung Yeshe Wiki - Dharma Dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
"Because the essential natures of the two truths, namely their essential natures of each being devoid of self-established existence, are inseparable, they are of the same essential nature", "because the identity of the Two Truths are inseparable inasmuch as they are (both) empty of true existence, they are of the same identity", "the Two Truths are one in nature because their natures are inseparable in terms of (both) being void of true existence". [[Erick Tsiknopoulos]]
+
བདེན་གཉིས་བདེན་སྟོང་དུ་ངོ་བོ་དབྱེར་མེད་པས་ངོ་བོ་གཅིག
 +
 
 +
"Because the essential natures of the Two Truths (ultimate truth and conventional truth), namely their essential natures of each being devoid of self-established existence, are inseparable, they are of the same essential nature", "because the identities of the Two Truths are indistinguishable inasmuch as they are (both) empty of true existence, they have the same identity", "the Two Truths are one in nature because their natures are indivisible in terms of them (both) being void of truly established existence". [[Erick Tsiknopoulos]]

Latest revision as of 10:58, 25 June 2021

བདེན་གཉིས་བདེན་སྟོང་དུ་ངོ་བོ་དབྱེར་མེད་པས་ངོ་བོ་གཅིག

"Because the essential natures of the Two Truths (ultimate truth and conventional truth), namely their essential natures of each being devoid of self-established existence, are inseparable, they are of the same essential nature", "because the identities of the Two Truths are indistinguishable inasmuch as they are (both) empty of true existence, they have the same identity", "the Two Truths are one in nature because their natures are indivisible in terms of them (both) being void of truly established existence". Erick Tsiknopoulos