upakleśa (3642)

upakleśa
Entry 3642, Page 134, Col. 1

(upakleSa, upakleSa)
upakleśa¦, m. (also semi-MIndic °kileśa; cf. upakli- śyate; = Pali upakkilesa, of which 5, 10, or 18 are enumer- ated; evidently there was no definitively fixed list), (minor, secondary) impurity, stain, depravity; in most texts no very clear distinction is made between them and the kleśa in principle, but AbhidhK. La V-P. v.88 ff. (see esp. 89 of Transl. note 2) insists on the fundamental distinction, and comm. cites a list of 21 upa°; they ‘proceed from’ kleśa, 91; a list of 24 in Dharmas 69, whereas in 67 the 6 kleśa have been listed; 4 upak° listed Bbh 10.7 (caturbhir upakleśair…upakliṣṭo bhavati) and 22 ff. (no relation to Dharmas list); Mvy 2138, following saṃyojana, ban- dhana, anuśaya, paryutthāna, and followed by paryava- sthāna (so read); cf. Bbh 202.20 saṃyojana-bandhanānu- śayopakleśa-paryavasthānānām; Śikṣ 222.10 (deflning upāyāsa) (ye cānya evamādaya) upakleśās ta upāyāsāḥ; cf. KP 93.3 sopadravaḥ sopakleśa(ḥ) sopāyāso; KP 99.2, see s.v. upakliśyate; Mv i.228.11, 15 vigatopakileśena; SP 318.2 (sattvānām alpakuśalamūlānāṃ) bahūpakleśā- nām; Laṅk 358.11 (vs) upakleśair manādibhiḥ (see s.v. mana, app. m.c. for māna, which however is standardly one of the kleśa); 369.4 °śair na lipyate. The word seems likely to have been originally a noun cpd., upa plus kleśa, the rare verb upakliśyate may be a back-formation from it; yet the ppp. upakkiliṭṭha occurs in canonical Pali.

{{#arraymap:

|; |@@@ | | }}