User talk:Richard: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Bj Lhundrup (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The underlined and/or highlighted words are links in case you may want more refined descriptions and associations. [[RWB]] | The underlined and/or highlighted words are links in case you may want more refined descriptions and associations. [[RWB]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Hey you still around? I needed to talk to you about how in the world you were adding the Eng/Wyl/Uni all in one so that a search for either will show the same page. I have been reading and testing the info from meta wikimedia and nothing. under the 1st dodrupchen I got the best results but they are NOT AT ALL the same. A search ran on the Uni&Wyl does not come up with the page like your way does, which is the whole point. Can you type me an exact sample of the code your typing. please?[[User:Bj Lhundrup|Bj Lhundrup]] | |||
Revision as of 04:24, 5 November 2008
Due to several requests here in this RYWiki I'd like to provide Erik's more detailed description of the 18 Dzogchen Tantras collected in one place. We see these mentioned sporadically or individually throughout various teachings...and I would like to have had this description close by at various times.
These come from the Appendix titled The Dzogchen Tantras, to Tsele Natsok Rangdrol's 17th century work titled "The Mirror of Mindfulness", translated by Erik Pema Kunsang, and published these days originally in 1987, again, by Rangjung Yeshe in Kathmandu, Nepal.
The underlined and/or highlighted words are links in case you may want more refined descriptions and associations. RWB
Hey you still around? I needed to talk to you about how in the world you were adding the Eng/Wyl/Uni all in one so that a search for either will show the same page. I have been reading and testing the info from meta wikimedia and nothing. under the 1st dodrupchen I got the best results but they are NOT AT ALL the same. A search ran on the Uni&Wyl does not come up with the page like your way does, which is the whole point. Can you type me an exact sample of the code your typing. please?Bj Lhundrup