shravakas: Difference between revisions

From Rangjung Yeshe Wiki - Dharma Dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
#redirect [[Sravakas]]
__NOTOC__
 
== .1 ==
What have been called Articles by Csoma and Schmidt, are a number of little affixes: ''[[pa]]'' ''[[ba]]'' ''[[ma]]'' ''[[po]]'' ''[[bo]]'' ''[[mo]]'', and some similar ones, which might perhaps be more adequately termed denominators, since their principle object is undoubtedly to represent a given root as a [[Noun|noun]], [[Substantive|substantive]] or [[Adjective|adjective]], as is most clearly perceptible in the instance of the roots of the verbs, to which ''[[pa]]'' or ''[[ba]]'' impart the notion of the [[Infinitive]] and [[Participle]], or the nearest abstract and nearest concrete nouns that can possibly be formed from the idea of a verb. These affixes are not, however, - except in this case - essential to a noun, as many substantives and adjectives and mostof the pronouns are never accompanied by them, and even those which usually appear connected with them, will drop them upon the slightest occaision.
 
== .2 ==
Almost the only case in which a syntactical use of them, like that of the English [[Definite Article|definite Article]], is perceptible, is that mentioned [[20. Remarks#.3|20.3]]; a formal one, that of distinguishing the [[Gender]], occurs in a limited number of owrds, where ''[[mo]]'' denotes the female, ''[[po]]'' the maculine.<BR><BR>
 
Thus: ''[[rgyal po]]'' ,king', ''[[rgyal mo]]'' ,queen'. Or, if the word in the masculine (or rather common) gender has no article, ''[[mo]]'' is added: ''[[seng ge]]'' ,lion', ''[[seng ge mo]]'' ,lioness'.
 
== .3 ==
 
 
 
<BR><BR>Click here to go to the front page of the [[Second Edition of H.A. Jaeschke's 'Tibetan Grammar']]

Revision as of 08:29, 16 February 2006


.1

What have been called Articles by Csoma and Schmidt, are a number of little affixes: pa ba ma po bo mo, and some similar ones, which might perhaps be more adequately termed denominators, since their principle object is undoubtedly to represent a given root as a noun, substantive or adjective, as is most clearly perceptible in the instance of the roots of the verbs, to which pa or ba impart the notion of the Infinitive and Participle, or the nearest abstract and nearest concrete nouns that can possibly be formed from the idea of a verb. These affixes are not, however, - except in this case - essential to a noun, as many substantives and adjectives and mostof the pronouns are never accompanied by them, and even those which usually appear connected with them, will drop them upon the slightest occaision.

.2

Almost the only case in which a syntactical use of them, like that of the English definite Article, is perceptible, is that mentioned 20.3; a formal one, that of distinguishing the Gender, occurs in a limited number of owrds, where mo denotes the female, po the maculine.

Thus: rgyal po ,king', rgyal mo ,queen'. Or, if the word in the masculine (or rather common) gender has no article, mo is added: seng ge ,lion', seng ge mo ,lioness'.

.3



Click here to go to the front page of the Second Edition of H.A. Jaeschke's 'Tibetan Grammar'